�ʹ�����app����

Our “Planet�� rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate ABLE “Good��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses some lower-impact materials including recycled materials.
• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.
• It produces long lasting products.
• To minimise waste, it reuses some of its scraps.

Workers�� rights are central to our “People�� rating, which assess brands�� policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate ABLE “Great��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It has a mission to improve social conditions and empower workers from disadvantaged communities.
• It partly traces its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
• It ensures some workers in the final production stage are paid a living wage.
• It audits its suppliers.

Brands�� animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals�� rating. Here we rate ABLE “It’s a Start��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
• It appears to use wool, silk, and pearl.
• It uses some recycled leather in its leather products.
• It doesn’t appear to use down, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate ABLE “Good�� overall.