�ʹ�����app����

Our “Planet�� rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate GRAMMAR “Great��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses a high proportion of lower-impact materials including organic cotton.
• Its use of lower-impact materials limits the amount of chemicals, water and wastewater used in production.
• It manufactures its products closer to home to reduce the climate impact of long-distance shipping.
• It uses recycled packaging.
• To minimise waste, it recycles most of its textile offcuts.

Workers�� rights are central to our “People�� rating, which assesses brands�� policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate GRAMMAR “Good��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• Its final production stage happens in the US, a medium risk country for labour abuse.
• It partly traces its supply chain including the final and some of the second production stages.
• It audits some of its suppliers but does not specify what proportion.
• It is unclear whether it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands�� animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals�� rating. Here we rate GRAMMAR “It’s a Start��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
• It appears to use horn.
• It doesn’t appear to use leather, wool, down, fur, angora, exotic animal hair or exotic animal skin.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate GRAMMAR “Good�� overall.