�ʹ�����app����

Our “Planet�� rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and Wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate L.O.M. “Not Good Enough��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• There’s no evidence it uses any lower-impact materials.
• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce water use.
• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce or eliminate hazardous chemicals in manufacturing.
• To minimise waste, it reuses some of its textile offcuts.

Workers�� rights are central to our “People�� rating, which assess brands�� policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate L.O.M. “Good��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• Its products are made in-house by a small team.
• There's no evidence it has a Code of Conduct but it has a formal statement covering workers' rights.
• It traces most of its Supply Chain.
• It ensures workers in the final production stage are paid a Living Wage, though not in its entire supply chain.

Brands�� animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals�� rating. Here we rate L.O.M. “Good��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It appears to use silk.
• It doesn’t appear to use leather, wool, down, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate L.O.M. “Good�� overall.