ʹapp

Image credit: Son of a Tailor

Son of a Tailor

Rated: Good

price:
$$$$

location: Denmark

Son of a Tailor sustainability rating

Planet

4 out of 5

People

4 out of 5

Animals

3 out of 5

Overall rating: Good

Our ratings are based on a scale from 1 (We avoid) to 5 (Great)


Our “Planet� rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate Son of a Tailor “Good�. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It uses a some lower-impact materials, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of materials used.
  • To minimise waste, its products are made to order.
  • It manufactures its products closer to home to reduce the climate impact of long-distance shipping.
  • There’s no evidence it takes action to minimise its packaging, which is a driver of plastic waste.

Workers� rights are central to our “People� rating, which assess brands� policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate Son of a Tailor “Good�. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • Its final production stage happens in Portugal.
  • Its Code of Conduct covers some ILO Four Fundamental Freedoms principles.
  • It audits some of its supply chain including all of the final production stage.
  • It traces most of its supply chain.
  • There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands� animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals� rating. Here we rate Son of a Tailor “It's a Start�. These are a few factors influencing its score:

  • It has a policy to source wool from non-mulesed sheep but doesn’t provide any evidence to verify its claims.
  • It doesn’t appear to use leather, angora, fur, shearling, cashmere, alpaca, mohair, or down.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate Son of a Tailor “Good� overall.

Last updated 2025-06-20