�ʹ�����app����

Our “Planet�� rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions to wastewater, ingredients' impacts, product circularity, and more. Here we rate uka “Not Good Enough��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses some lower-impact ingredients including organic, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of ingredients used.
• There’s no evidence it’s taking meaningful action to reduce its climate impacts.
• It offers in-store refills for some products but doesn't track and report on repeat purchases.
• It could be using palm oil, but it has not disclosed any information regarding responsible sourcing that mitigates environmental impacts.

Workers�� rights are central to our “People�� rating, which assesses brands�� policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate uka “Not Good Enough��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• Much of its final stage is located in lower-risk countries or certified facilities, however it does not publish an aggregate breakdown of suppliers.
• There's no evidence it audits its suppliers
• There’s no evidence it has a Code of Conduct.
• There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Note that the “People�� rating in Good On You’s methodology is defined by labour rights and does not consider consumer health.

Brands�� animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products, are the focus of our “Animals�� rating. Here we rate uka “It's a Start��. It doesn’t clearly state what animal-derived materials it uses.

• It claims to not test its finished products on animals, but it is not certified.

Based on all the publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate uka “Not Good Enough�� overall.