�ʹ�����app����

Our “Planet�� rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate ARTICLE22 “Good��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses a medium proportion of lower-impact materials including upcycled materials.
• It completes the first and second stages of production closer to home to reduce its climate impact.
• It manufactures its products by hand to reduce its climate impact.
• There’s no evidence it takes action to minimise its packaging, which is a driver of plastic waste.

Workers�� rights are central to our “People�� rating, which assess brands�� policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate ARTICLE22 “Great��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It traces most of its supply chain.
• It has a mission to improve social conditions in Laos.
• It ensures workers in the final production stage are paid a living wage, though not in its entire supply chain.

Brands�� animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals�� rating. Here we rate ARTICLE22 “Good��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It appears to use leather.
• It doesn’t appear to use wool, down, fur, angora, exotic animal hair, or exotic animal skin.
• It uses few animal-derived materials.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate ARTICLE22 “Good�� overall.