�ʹ�����app����

Our “Planet�� rating evaluates brands based on the environmental policies in their supply chains, from carbon emissions and Wastewater to business models and product circularity. Here we rate ����ä�ٳٱ�����ܲ���� “Great��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It uses a medium proportion of lower-impact materials including recycled materials.
• It uses lower-impact materials that help limit the chemicals, water, and wastewater in its Supply Chain.
• It uses renewable energy in its direct operations (such as stores or offices) but not in its supply chain.
• To minimise plastic waste, it uses packaging that consumers can repurpose and reuse.

Workers�� rights are central to our “People�� rating, which assess brands�� policies and practices on everything from child labour to living wages and gender equality. Here we rate ����ä�ٳٱ�����ܲ���� “Not Good Enough��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• It does not disclose where its Final Stage of Production occurs.
• It traces most of its supply chain.
• It claims it has a Code of Conduct but does not publicly disclose it.
• There’s no evidence it ensures workers are paid living wages in its supply chain.

Brands�� animal welfare policies and, where applicable, how well they trace their animal-derived products are the focus of our “Animals�� rating. Here we rate ����ä�ٳٱ�����ܲ���� “Good��. These are a few factors influencing its score:

• There’s no evidence it has an animal welfare policy.
• It appears to use silk.
• Responsible Down Standard certifies the down it uses.
• It doesn’t appear to use leather, fur, angora, exotic animal skin, or exotic animal hair.

Based on all publicly available information we’ve reviewed, we rate ����ä�ٳٱ�����ܲ���� “Good�� overall.